Typical Price: $2,799.95
CNET Editors' Rating: 5.0 / 5
The good: The Panasonic TC-PST60 series has a reasonable price, incredibly good picture quality with exceedingly deep black levels, great shadow detail, accurate colors, solid bright-room performance, and superb off-angle and uniformity characteristics; it also features sleek styling with metal accents, offers plenty of Smart TV content, and includes two pairs of 3D glasses.
The bad: Worse 3D quality than many competing TVs; not as suited to extremely bright rooms as some LCD models; consumes more power than LCD TVs; introduces significant input lag.
The bottom line: The midlevel price and outstanding quality of the Panasonic TC-PST60 series make it our strongest TV recommendation ever.
Design, Features & Performance (out of 10)
I've written TV reviews for more than 10 years, but I'm pretty sure this one is the most important. I'll cut to the chase: if you value picture quality, don't have money to burn, and don't game seriously enough to worry about input lag, you should buy the Panasonic TC-PST60.
Yes, it's a plasma. That's the main reason why its picture is so good. And despite what you may have heard, there's very little reason not to get a plasma TV. Once you decide to go plasma -- don't worry, you'll be fine -- the next question is which one. That's what makes the ST60 so important. It's Panasonic's least expensive 2013 TV set to boast this extremely high level of picture quality, and Panasonic is the only TV manufacturer even trying to make premium-performing TVs affordable these days. Given the company's financial trouble, the future of its plasma TV business is far from certain.
Yes, I expect a few TVs to deliver an even better picture than the ST60 this year, but they'll all cost a lot more. And yes, a couple of cheaper 2013 TVs, in particular Panasonic's own S60 series, might perform well enough to earn an "excellent" picture quality score from us. But I'll be extremely surprised if any 2013 TV surpasses the ST60's combination of jaw-dropping performance and practical affordability.
Editors' Note, November 15, 2013: Panasonic has announced that it will no longer manufacture plasma televisions after 2013, making these TVs the last of their kind. That fact doesn't negatively affect our buying advice; in fact, just the opposite. We have confidence Panasonic will remain a viable company, and continue to support its plasma TVs, for years.
Series information: I performed a hands-on evaluation of the 55-inch TC-P55ST60, but this review also applies to the other screen sizes in the series. All sizes have identical specs and according to the manufacturer should provide very similar picture quality.
|Models in series (details)|
|Panasonic TC-P50ST60||50 inches|
|Panasonic TC-P55ST60 (reviewed)||55 inches|
|Panasonic TC-P60ST60||60 inches|
|Panasonic TC-P65ST60||65 inches|
Panasonic upped its focus on external appearance again in 2013 with what it calls "glass and metal design." While metallic touches on a TV might not be as impressive as they are on a smartphone, the ST60's chrome edging feels decidedly higher-end than the clear acrylic of the ST50 from last year.
The TV's glossy black frame, at a bit over an inch along the top and sides, is the same width as last year's, and panel depth is also relatively thin at 2 inches. These svelte dimensions allow the ST60 to at least approach the minimalist look of a many modern LED-based LCD TVs.
I also appreciated that the company returned to the black stand rather than sticking with 2012's silver one. Its profile is pleasingly low-slung, but it still doesn't allow the panel to swivel. When asked why not at a press event, Panasonic's reps claimed first that swivels cause cords to detach, and then that plasmas' wide viewing angles (compared to LCD) make swiveling less necessary. I say, cop-out.
The ST60 gets the nonilluminated remote that shipped with step-down models like the UT50. I like its logical layout and clear button differentiation. Tweaks for 2013 are mostly improvements (dedicated Netflix key, better labeling, and a few extra keys) but there are exceptions. Apps and Home, both part of the Smart TV suite, get too-prominent keys, while Menu is tiny. More than a few times I accidentally hit Home instead of the Up cursor.
The TV has two separate menu systems -- one for Smart TV and the other, accessible via that little Menu key, for more mundane TV settings like picture and network options -- and there's no way to get from one to the other using the menus themselves (Update: There is but it's still tough to find; select the Menu icon from top row of the main Viera Connect apps page). I thought the blue Settings icon from within the Smart TV Home system would take me to the TV's settings, but instead it took me to a configuration page for Smart TV itself. Once I found them, Panasonic's 2013 settings menus were a big improvement over last year's version, with easier navigation and sleeker design.
|Key TV features|
|Display technology||Plasma||LED backlight||N/A|
|Smart TV||Yes||Internet connection||Built-in Wi-Fi|
|3D technology||Active||3D glasses included||2 pair|
|Refresh rate(s)||96Hz, 60Hz, 48Hz||Dejudder (smooth) processing||Yes|
|Other: Optional touch pen (model TY-TP10U, $79); Skype camera (model TY-CC20W, $90); additional 3D glasses (model TY-ER3D5MA, $79)|
Aside from its augmented Smart TV experience, detailed below, the main thing separating the feature set of the ST60 and the less expensive S60 is 3D capability. New for 2013, Panasonic finally includes 3D glasses in the box; you get two pairs. The included glasses, model TY-ER3D5MA, are much nicer than Samsung's 2012 throw-ins but not quite as good as Panasonic's own sold-separately TY-ER3D4MU ($75 each). The latter are also rechargeable, while the included ones require a coin battery. Panasonic told me additional pairs of the new 5MA glasses would sell for $79 each, or $149 for a two-pack. The ST60 complies with the full HD 3D standard, so that it will work with third-party glasses like the aforementioned Samsungs ($20).
The step-up VT60 series, in addition to supposedly enhanced picture quality (a THX mode, more steps of gradation, possibly better black levels due in part to a better screen filter, and a new red phosphor for a wider color gamut), gets a few more features including a touch-pad remote, a built-in camera, voice recognition, and better speakers. Unlike last year, the ST60 and all higher-end plasmas have 96Hz modes as well as 48Hz (see below).
One unique extra for all 2013 Panasonic plasmas is a touch-pen accessory ($79), which as you might guess allows users to draw on the screen. It works, but I don't see how it's at all useful outside of a presentation environment.
Panasonic also talks up its improved Viera Remote app. While the ST60 lacks the level of smartphone/tablet communication synergy seen on some competitors -- such as screen mirroring and NFC -- the app still enables some functions like basic control if you misplace the remote and "swipe and share" to easily display photos on the big screen. At least that's what Panasonic told me; I was never able to get the app, officially called "Viera Remote2" in the Google Play store, to "discover" my ST60. That seems like a common problem, according to user reviews. It's worth noting that the remote's advanced calibration capabilities are reserved for the VT60 and ZT60 plasmas as well as the WT60 and DT60 LCDs.
Smart TV: I'll get to the new Smart features in a minute, but first let me describe a couple of dumb additions. When you first power on the set you're greeted not by whatever source you last chose -- typically your cable box -- but instead by the home page for the Smart TV suite. Panasonic tells us this is a conscious design decision, meant to make users more aware of the existence of the Smart features and encourage their use. I consider it an annoying intrusion, so I was glad to discover you can (mostly) turn it off so that the TV will start up on the full-screen page.
In addition, Panasonic is still the only smart TV maker dumb enough to show an actual banner advertisement when you first turn on the TV -- in the case of my review sample it was for (wait for it...) MySpace.com. The banner's presence, which lasts about 5 seconds and only appears when you first power up the TV, is enabled by default. Happily, as with last year's, you can turn it off, too.
After you've dedumbed it by disabling those defaults, Panasonic's new interface is mostly good. As with last year's, there are multiple "pages" available, and all show the currently playing input in an inset window along with a grid of apps. You can place any app anywhere you want on the grid, a welcome change from interfaces like Samsung's that offer only partial customization. Panasonic ups the custom ante further by offering three different templates for new pages you can create, custom backgrounds (including your own pictures), and the ability to name pages -- for example, each member of a particularly tech-savvy family could set up his or her own page.
There's also some bad. For someone used to swiping left or right on a smartphone to access different pages of apps, Panasonic's method isn't intuitive; you have to press the Home key again to switch between pages, rather than simply navigating among them directly. And it's potentially confusing that one page is actually the "Full-Screen TV" page, and that hitting Exit from another page doesn't take you there (you have to actively select the window). Conversely, hitting the "Return" key from within an app often exits it completely, as opposed to navigating up a level. I was also annoyed that you can't delete or change the default Info and Lifestyle pages, although you can rename them.
A few times a message appeared telling me the server was temporarily unable to process my request, so I should try again later. Navigation was relatively snappy on the pages themselves, but bogged down inside the Viera Connect market and many apps.
All of the apps from 2012 are still available, and it's a very healthy selection. Not much worthwhile has been added this year however. Hit the apps key and you'll be taken to a page with a bunch of thumbnails showing preinstalled apps, such as YouTube and Netflix and a product support app, as well as a few custom utilities like a calendar, a memo app, and an event timer. It would be nice if they could tap into common cloud apps like Google Calendar or Evernote, but no dice. It goes without saying that typing a note using the remote and virtual keyboard is hardly worth the effort.
Non-preinstalled apps can be accessed from the Viera Connect market, where the most useful names include Vudu, Pandora, TuneIn, Rhapsody, a free classical music portal, and full episodes and photos from a Panasonic-sponsored series on National Geographic TV about World Heritage sites. You'll have to create a Viera Connect account to install them, unfortunately. The rest of the apps are much less useful. They include apps for use with the optional touch pen, a smattering of kids' apps, and the requisite crappy games. Panasonic is still the only maker with a store that also offers real merchandise, from a $20 SD card to a $526 microwave.
And yes, there's a Web browser, but as usual it's terrible compared with a phone or especially to a laptop browser. Loading CNET.com resulted in a jumble of improper text overlays, rendering the page illegible. Navigation was sluggish and quite frustrating with the remote's cursor keys. In short, you should use the browser only when no other recourse is available. If you find yourself wanting to use the browser much, it's probably worth attaching a USB keyboard with an integrated touch pad or trackball.
Picture settings: Panasonic is slowly approaching the levels of adjustability found on other high-end TVs. New for 2013, it has migrated some of the advanced picture controls found on the flagship 2012 VT50 to the ST60. These include a 10-point grayscale and 10-point gamma system as well as color management for the primary colors (the latter, along with a 2-point grayscale, is found on the S60 too). The company has also added another picture mode, "Home Theater," atop its standard four, and a cool "copy adjustments" option that allows you to migrate your picture settings from one input or mode to others.
Other controls include three levels of dejudder, aka soap opera effect, an unusual seven different aspect ratio settings, and the usual array of items to help prevent and treat image retention, including a pixel orbiter and scrolling white bar.
Connectivity: Three HDMI ports, an analog video input that can handle either composite or component connections, and a pair of USB ports are standard for this level of TV. The SD card slot is a nice -- and uncommon -- addition, however. In case you're counting, none of the HDMI ports is MHL-compatible, although one can handle ARC.
The ST60's picture fidelity is outstanding. It compares favorably to the best TVs I've ever reviewed, with superb, inky, deep black levels; ample shadow detail; accurate color; and very good video processing. Its bright-room picture is also top-notch, thanks to an antireflective filter that far surpasses that of the step-down S60 series.
As usual, if you have an extremely bright room, you may want to choose an LCD instead, but for nearly every normal room, this plasma is plenty bright -- and has the characteristic near-perfect uniformity and off-angle performance of its breed. Its biggest flaw is 3D picture quality, but I don't even consider that important enough to include in my consideration of its overall picture quality score, which is a solid 9 out of 10.
Update: If you're serious about playing fast-paced video games, this TV's significant input lag might give you pause. Check out our in-depth test for more, which includes a discussion of the subject, a subjective evaluation of the ST60's lag, and some alternative TVs.
Click the image at the right to see the picture settings used in the review and to read more about how this TV's picture controls worked during calibration.
|Comparison models (details)|
|Panasonic TC-P55ST50||55-inch plasma (2012)|
|Panasonic TC-P50S60||50-inch plasma (2013)|
|Samsung PN60E6500||60-inch plasma (2012)|
|Sony KDL-55W900A||55-inch LED (2013)|
|Panasonic TC-L55DT60||55-inch LED (2013)|
|Panasonic TC-P65VT50 (reference)||65-inch plasma|
Black level: The ST60 produces among the deepest black levels I've seen from any plasma TV, and that's saying something. According to my measurements, it beats out all of the 2012 plasmas in this area aside from the VT50 itself, our current plasma reference.
In a dark room during my subjective side-by-side comparison, the only set that looked darker was the Sony on its most aggressive local dimming setting -- but due to the Sony's blooming and murky shadow detail, the ST60 looked significantly better overall.
Between the ST60 and VT50, it was a virtual tie. I placed the TVs directly next to one another, and during the darkest scene of a very dark film, the beginning of Chapter 12 from "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part 2," they looked nearly identical. The letterbox bars were inky, the shadows in the robes of the Death Eaters were dark yet rich with detail, and both the hillside behind Hogwarts and the castle-school itself were rendered with all of the detail of the source.
The ST60's gamma was a bit bright overall according to our measurements, but in person that issue was almost impossible to detect. Sure, some shadows might have looked very slightly too-bright next to the VT50, but they were so close that any difference would be impossible to discern outside of a side-by-side lineup.
Watching those scenes and comparing the ST60 with the others, the ST50, S60, and PNE6500 were all lighter in the letterbox bars and other areas. The S60 actually looked the darkest of the three by a nose, but side by side against the ST60 it still lacked a bit of contrast and pop, and the other two a bit more so. The 2012 sets were still superb, but the ST60 was just a bit better. Finally, every TV in the room far surpassed the DT60 in this department.
Compared with the LEDs, the dimmer image produced by the ST60 and the other plasmas in very bright scenes, like the all-white world of Harry's vision of the fetal Voldemort in Chapter 22 (1:31:48), could be seen as a disadvantage. In my experience however, the light-output limitations of plasmas in such scenes are visible only in side-by-side comparisons and don't detract at all from critical viewing in dim and dark rooms.
Color accuracy: The ST60 maintains Panasonic's superb 2012 record in this area, and if anything improves upon it. A lot of that is due to superior controls during calibration; the new color management system works beautifully to fix the slightly desaturated look of default Cinema, and as a result colors are rich and natural, and again nearly the equal of the VT50's.
During the Snape memory sequence (Chapter 19), for example, the skin tone of young Lily looked as pale and delicate as it should, and her fiery red hair wasn't too red. The green of the grass and blue of the sky were likewise well-represented. Tones in dark areas appeared true as well, and while not quite as neutral as on the VT50, they did look better than the slight green of the ST50 and the more obvious green of the S60.
I did see a redder tinge in the ST60 during the darkest parts of the Creation sequence from "Tree of Life," but that was mainly due to a decision I made during calibration to preserve the accuracy of brighter scenes. This issue, and a slight edge in apparent saturation, put the VT50 ahead of the ST60 in this department, but just barely.
Video processing: Both the 60Hz and the 96Hz mode handled 1080p/24 sources properly in my test. As on the VT50, I did detect slight flicker in 96Hz in bright areas, for example the clouds over Brooklyn in "I Am Legend" (24:49).
I did notice some artifacts from 1080p/24 sources in 60Hz mode. On the "Digital Video Essentials" test Blu-ray, we noticed shifting lines and minor instability in the downtown Philadelphia buildings during an upward-facing pan. I didn't see any similar issues during other program material, but assume they might crop up. It's also worth noting that the TV scored higher in motion resolution (1,200 lines versus 700) when I engaged 96Hz mode. In any case, I still prefer the flicker-free 60Hz mode, but it's great to have a choice between 96Hz and 60Hz this year (48Hz, as usual, created unbearable flicker).
As usual, the results of engaging Motion Smoother dejudder processing were objectionable to my eyes, although some viewers might actually want its soap opera effect. Both smoothness and artifacting increased when I moved up in settings from Weak to Mid to Strong.
Unlike the ST50 from last year and this year's S60, the ST60 passed the Film Resolution Loss test in the default Auto setting; there was no need to manually switch it to On.
I also noticed what appeared to be slightly smoother gradations on the ST60. At the 22:09 mark during "Tree of Life," the fading light from a white galaxy appeared smoother on the ST60 (and the Sony LCD) than on any of the other plasmas (including the S60), which showed visible gradation steps of minor "false contouring" or solarization. Many other similar images in this sequence of "Tree" did show visible gradations on the ST60 as well; however, they're rare in other program material on any display. It's worth noting that Panasonic touts improved gradation only on its 2013 VT60 and ZT60 models, so I'm not sure whether what I saw is related.
Bright lighting: Under bright lights, the ST60 performed quite well, thanks to an improved screen filter. It maintained black-level fidelity almost as well as the VT50, slightly better than the ST50, and about the same as the Samsung E6500, if not quite as well as the Sony.
More importantly for 2013 comparison shoppers, it totally trounced the S60 in this area. The S60's screen washed out severely under the lights and also created brighter reflections. This is the main picture quality difference between the two sets, and significant enough by itself to establish the ST60's clear superiority. In a light-controlled room the two are relatively close, but under moderate or higher lighting the ST60 stands far above its step-down linemate.
Panasonic's screen filter acts like venetian blinds to reject light coming from above. Compared with the S60, the ST60's filter did dim the image more when seen from high off-angle vertically. In practice this difference is only visible from angles that are roughly equivalent to placing the TV on the floor. As usual for a plasma, horizontal off-angle viewing, which is far more important than vertical in typical living-room situations, looked essentially perfect -- in marked contrast to both LCDs, for example.
Compared with many LCDs, the ST60 has a limited maximum light output. On their brightest picture settings with a window pattern, the ST60 and ST50 measured 56 and 61fL (footlamberts) respectively, while the Sony and Panasonic LCDs hit 99 and 76. With a full-screen pattern, those same numbers drop to 13 and 14 (ST60 and ST50) and 100 and 106 (Sony and Panasonic LCDs). If you have an extremely bright room or just prefer watching an extremely bright picture (like Vivid or Dynamic on your current TV), you may want to get an LED instead. That said, the light output of any of these plasmas is more than ample for the vast majority of room-lighting situations.
Sound quality: The ST60's sound was good enough for a TV but not spectacular. Music from our Nick Cave test track sounded slightly muddled and distant, and bass was a bit distorted compared with on the ST50. Movies, as expected, were more satisfying; dialogue was clear enough in "Mission: Impossible 3," and there was some urgency to explosions, with details like shattered glass making themselves apparent.
3D: (Update, April 15: This section, along with The Bad at the top of the review, was updated based upon additional testing after the review first posted.)If you care a lot about 3D picture quality, the 3D performance of the ST60 is somewhat disappointing compared with its 2D prowess.
New for this year Panasonic has added three hertz values (96Hz, 100Hz, and 120Hz) under "3D refresh rate" in its 3D menu. Although described as designed to combat flicker from fluorescent lights, they also have a major impact on the prevalence of crosstalk. That bugaboo of 3D TVs, especially those that use active 3D technology, appears as a ghostly double-image around many onscreen objects.
The ST60's double image was least noticeable and objectionable in the 96Hz mode. During my favorite crosstalk tests from "Hugo," including Hugo's hand as it reaches for the mouse (5:01), the tuning pegs on the guitar (7:49), and the face of the dog as it watches the inspector slide by (9:24), the ST60's crosstalk was quite dim -- a better performance than the E6500, although not quite as good as the Sony W900, where crosstalk was even less visible. The three Panasonic plasmas, meanwhile, were roughly equal when I placed the ST60 in 96Hz and the VT50 and ST50 in 48Hz mode.
(When the ST60 is in 3D mode, the "Hz" values under "24p Direct in" in the Advanced menu are grayed out and can't be adjusted, apparently because they're superseded by the three 3D refresh rate settings. That's different from on the 2012 plasmas, which use this setting for both 2D and 3D. The new menu design tripped me up initially, so I originally reported that characteristics like crosstalk reduction can't be adjusted on the ST60.)
Choosing the 100Hz setting worsened crosstalk considerably, and the 120Hz setting was worst of all. This adjustment didn't seem to do anything else to picture quality, and I didn't test its effects on fluorescent light flicker.
The ST60's 3D was still worse than that of the VT50 and ST50, however, because of the way it handled quick motion. During the herky-jerky chase sequence beginning at about 7:19, for example, the ST60's images seemed to break up and confuse me visually, taking me out of the moment. It was worst when I paid attention to the legs of the running dog, the arms of the flailing conductor, or other bursts of movement. The effect wasn't overwhelmingly distasteful, but it was still worse to watch these scenes on the ST60 than on the others. I couldn't address it with any of the settings adjustments I tried -- for example reducing light output/contrast or changing any of the 3D refresh rate or motion smoother settings.
In the default Cinema mode, the ST60's color and shadow detail were fine, and black levels looked a bit deeper than any of the other plasmas' while picture brightness was about the same. The ST60 did have a slightly more noticeable bluish cast than the others, however, so overall the VT50 especially showed better color. Note that I don't calibrate for 3D, so any of these characteristics might be improved if you do so.
Panasonic's new throw-in 2013 glasses aren't as good as the TY-ER3D4MUs from 2012. Their thin temples do little to block light from the sides, and they didn't fit over my prescription glasses as well. They're still fine, however, and fit better than the $20 Samsungs. I didn't notice any overt picture quality difference between any of them.
Power consumption: [Note that this test and all of the chart numbers below apply only to the 55-inch TC-P55ST60; not to any of the other sizes.] The 55ST60 uses significantly more juice than any similarly-sized LCD-based TV, and almost exactly the same as the 2012 model after calibration. The default Standard mode draws a bit more power than last year, but it's also a bit brighter. That's a good thing because past Standard modes were way too dim.
The current Energy Star specification is still version 5.3, which still imposes a hard cap of 108 watts for any size of TV. According to the Energy Star April 2013 list of qualified TVs, no 2013 Panasonic plasma earns the blue sticker.
Editors' note: CNET has dropped TV power consumption testing for 60-inch or smaller LCD- and LED-based TVs because their power use, in terms of yearly cost, is negligible. We will continue to test the power use of larger LCD or LED models, as well as all plasma models.
|Panasonic TC-P55ST60||Picture settings|
|Picture on (watts)||168.6||249.29||N/A|
|Picture on (watts/sq. inch)||0.13||0.19||N/A|
|Cost per year||$37.04||$54.73||N/A|
|Score (considering size)||Average|
|GEEK BOX: Test||Result||Score|
|Black luminance (0%)||0.00373||Good|
|Avg. gamma (10-100%)||2.14||Good|
|Avg. grayscale error (10-100%)||1.931||Good|
|Near-black error (5%)||1.415||Good|
|Dark gray error (20%)||2.519||Good|
|Bright gray error (70%)||0.989||Good|
|Avg. color error||1.465||Good|
|1080p/24 Cadence (IAL)||Pass||Good|
|1080i Deinterlacing (film)||Pass||Good|
|Motion resolution (max)||1200||Good|
|Motion resolution (dejudder off)||1200||Average|
|Input lag (Game mode)||73.6||Poor|
Read more about how wetest TVs.
|Product Description||65 in Plasma, Panasonic TC P65ST60|
|Diagonal Size||65 in|
|Dimensions (WxDxH)||59 in x 14.1 in x 36.9 in - With stand|
|Resolution||1920 x 1080|
|Technology||( NeoPDP )|
|Image Aspect Ratio||16:9|
|Digital TV Tuner||ATSC|
|Analog TV Tuner||NTSC|
|Additional Features||Eco navigation, 2D to 3D Conversion, VIERA remote 2 App Support, Swipe & Share 2.0, Bluetooth Human Interface Device Profile, Narrow Bezel Concept, Infinite Black Pro Panel, App Launcher, Remote Play, Browse and Share, Eco Mode, Contrast auto tracking system (CATS), eHELP, Mercury Free, Product Support Center, My Home Screen, VIERA Link|
|Speaker System||2 speakers, Woofer|
|Sound Effects||VR-Audio Pro Surround 2.1|
|Supported Flash Memory Cards||SDXC Memory Card, SD Memory Card|
|Remote Control||Standard remote control|
|Power||AC 120 V ( 60 Hz )|
|Manufacturer Warranty||1 year warranty|
Average User Rating: 5.0 / 5
User Rating Breakdown
5 Star: 2
4 Star: 0
3 Star: 0
2 Star: 0
1 Star: 0
Rating: 5 / 5
on July 2, 2013
5 out of 5 users found this review helpful
Pros: Amazing picture quality. Netflix runs smooth
Superb colors and black level
Extensive pro-level calibration settings
Very thin bezel looks good
Cons: Remote button placement (accidentally pressed HOME button more than once which annoyingly brings up the TV's smart tv home menu)
Summary: I already own three Panasonic plasmas and really enjoy them. But this new 65" ST is mind blowing. The colors are very accurate, the contrast is so good and the black is really dark so good content has a lot of depth. Makes you more aware of the videography work and camera quality. Just set it up two days ago so will still need to play with settings and may use some of the online (professional) suggestions.
I tried the 2D to 3D converter and it seems rather gimmicky. Will try to get some 3d blurays from library. Should be nice.
Have fooled around with wi-fi features only a little and seems quite nice. Never had a Smart TV before so learning curve will take time.
I ordered this tv for less money than this site and shipping worked out fine.(sub 2k) Got it up on my wall in no time. Get the 65" if you can afford it. After a day or two it doesn't appear too large. Actually, it's just right for our space. (It's a great room space).
I imagine the only better plasma than this is the VT and ZT models from Panasonic and I didn't want to spend that much. This tv is very thin for a plasma and the thin bezel looks good since you barely notice it. At 85 lbs it's lighter than my older 50". (70% more screen real estate on 65" than 50").
Plasmas look much better than the majority of LCD/LED screens except the very expensive full array/local dimming models. Just as with most products, the majority of people do not do much intelligent research so will go to Target and get a Vizio or Samsung LED on sale and be very happy with it. Just hope they never see this Panasonic.
PS: if you will buy this Panny, I suggest check best price at: hdtvspickup.blogspot.com/p/panasonic-tc-p65st60_3.html
Hope this helps.
Updated on Dec 21, 2013
I suggest to check for best price at: Plasmahdtvchoose.wordpress.com/panasonic-viera-tc-p65st60/
Great picture quality for half the price.
Rating: 5 / 5
on May 1, 2013
3 out of 4 users found this review helpful
Pros: -Great picture quality
-Simple and nice design
-Easy to use interface
Cons: -I really don't have much here. The 3D isn't that great, but I'm not a 3D fan so it's not a major con for me.
Summary: This TV is great. From physical design to picture quality, Panasonic hits the right chords all around.
First off, the reason to buy this TV is for it's picture quality. It looks great out of the box but I recommend using CNET's suggested settings. The only thing I did differently is brighten it up a bit by using the high backlighting option over the low. When you look at this TV you can clearly see a picture quality that is a step above most. Everything is so crisp and clean and the black levels are so deep. I have friends and family that always say to me "they all look the same to me". Well, this one does not look the same. Especially when you pop a blu-ray in. I don't know if I've ever seen a more clean, clear, and deep image as when I put in The Hobbit.
The physical design of the TV is fairly straightforward. Nothing special here, but it looks nice and clean which is what I like.
The interface that Panasonic has set up on this TV is great. I like having a little bit of a computer feel to my TV when I turn it on. When it comes on there are a few panels available to pick. The panels have certain apps that you can customize and things like that. I like the feel of it, but if you don't like that you can change the settings to just have it open to whatever channel you are on. The TV has built in wi-fi which is nice. What is really nice is that is has built in dual band wi-fi. I did not know this when I bought the TV so it was a nice surprise to be able to connect to my 5Ghz signal.
I won't really write anything here on 3D. I don't like 3D and I don't intend to use it, but it's on the TV. So if you want to have 3D, it's there.
What really makes this TV great is its price. Yes, it is $2,300 and yes, you can get 70" TV's from Vizio and Sharp for less than this 65". However, if you move up for the size of the other TV's, you are going to drop down greatly in picture quality. To me, the most important aspect of the TV is picture quality. So at $2,300, this is a great deal. We are talking about picture quality that is on par with Sony's XBR series and Sharp's Elite series. When you start looking at those TV's (which do have great picture quality) you are looking at spending double and maybe even triple what you would spend here on a Panasonic.
So the only thing left to discuss is the issue of this TV being a Plasma. People have got to stop fearing Plasma TV's like they are radioactive. The amount of strain that you would have to put on a modern TV to experience burn-in is insane. We are talking about putting a single, non moving image on your screen for weeks upon weeks without turning it off to even begin to have a chance at a serious burn-in issue. The other idea of Plasma TV's taking up piles of energy to run is also ridiculous. This TV will cost you about $10-$15 more to run over the coarse of a year than a comparable LED. The only legitimate con that I accept about a Plasma is that they run darker than an LED. Yes, they do run darker but you need to evaluate when and where you are going to be using your TV. I personally watch a majority of my TV in my living room at night. For this purpose a Plasma is perfect because a really bright TV at night can be a bit annoying. Yeah, when I watch it on a Saturday afternoon, there is a little bit of glare and it isn't as bright, but it is still a great picture.
All in all, this TV well worth the money. I know that $2,300 isn't chump change, but when we are talking about top end picture quality in TV's, there is no better buy than the Panasonic ST60 series.